DBQ

None-violence shows how individuals can still dominate over current power without reacting in an unreasonable way. This could be displayed by not responding to a physical or mental blow in the same way. In the way Martin Luther king decided to boycott buses during the Rosa Parks incident shows how without saying a single word can prove a point then just making it physical(Doc. B). Non-Violence can work to show a positive example to by-standers and those committing the violence. At the Dharasana Salt Works the display of such violent actions from police was disgusting. The Gandhi men did not move an inch while beaten which showed a lot of courage and surprised the police. They should have noticed and stopped immediately (Doc. G). As frustrating as it must be you must use non-violence to teach an conquer enemies. In (Doc. I) it was said that although there will be consequences to what they were about to do you must not let that go against what you believe in. Don't stoop down to their level because it will make you not above but equal to them. It is clear that excepting the rule of not retaliating or having any possessions that could persuade you into doing so can help non-violence work in many ways (Doc. H).
By responding in a drastic that can make enemies think their actions can also work. By putting all things aside to fast and pray to purify yourself from thoughts of violence can work to also (Doc. A). When Gandhi began to fast for days until violence was not taking place among his men it softened them into quiting because it was hurting him and also them ( Movie 1). When Gandhi was thrown off the train he continued to go behind what he believed in and did not argue of feud with anyone ( Movie 2).
At the sit-ins in Georgia they were fighting for not just them selves but for all races. As they got things thrown and poured on them they never said a thing or argued. They demonstrated a silent protest and succeeded (Doc. E). And without having other races included in the whole movement could not have made it as successful as it is today (Doc. M).

I think non-violence is the best solution because it gives you obedience in life. Without retaliating to every distraction that comes your way when trying to change reality or the world can cause you to not succeed or finish what you have started.

Rights Assignment

1. Freedom of Speech.

2. It exists to supply people with a say in how they live, how they're treated and what they receive in a country.

3. So that citizens that aren't a part of their government can freely express their own ideas and thoughts. Whatever is said can't be censored and you can also receive and practice information said by someone else freely.

4.

5. They exist so that people won't take this right to a further extent then what it was intended to. The limitations keep things in order.

6. I would want to be able to reject anything the law puts out that I don't like and they should be have to change it to our liking.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech

http://media.www.paisano-online.com/media/storage/paper975/news/2006/02/20/Opinion/The-Limit.Of.Freedom.Of.Speech-2672549.shtml

F5: Polar Bears are drowning because of ice melting.

1. Will Iredale - http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article767459.ece

2. He is a reporter.

3. It was studied and tested to be recorded for as data.

4. Researchers see polar bears exhausted from swimming miles although they are strong. They start loosing stamina because all ice plates are gone.

5. no. the source doesn't have proof of actually seeing a polar bear drowning.


1. Bill Mouland - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-433170/Global-warming-sees-polar-bears-stranded-melting-ice.html

2. He writes articles for The Daily Mail, The Daily Telegraph and The Times.

3. readers commented and reviewed article to that it can be accurate .

4. It's not hard for them to swim for many miles but as they get to a piece of ice its almost gone and they are stranded.

5. Yes. the have a picture of a couple of them on a piece of ice almost melted away.



1. Elizabeth Shogren - http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=18121378

2. Henry Kacprzyk works at a zoo educating people on the endangered polar bears.

3. They have many sub facts about the article.

4. They talk about how since the ice is melting that are for polar bears to rest on after swimming many are getting endangered.

5. Yes because it could happen since they could possibly die.

I belive it because all sources give many believable facts.

F4: Global Warming creates evaporation.

1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Polar Continental Shelf Project - http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/07/070703173140.htm

2. They have facts taken from other scientists.

3. They study impacts on enviromental subjects.

4. Arctic Ponds are drying up

5. Yes many others a drying.


1. Tom Jackson - http://www.sanduskyregister.com/articles/2008/09/06/front/885859.txt

2. Don Wuebbles is a professor at the University of Illinois.

3. This summers temperature will rise very high due to G. W. which will affect lakes and rivers.

4. Yes. Temps were raised in the past as a suprise.

1.

F3: Will the arctic ice cap melt?

1. Merco Press. South Atlantic news Agency - http://en.mercopress.com/2009/03/19/antarctic-ice-cap-melting-much-faster-than-predicted

2. It's an agency that studies the arctic on different levels.

3. They said the ice caps are mmelting much more faster than before due to warming sea levels.

4. Yes. Because if temps were not getting hirer then ice caps would be frozen to a solid.

1. Sandi Doughton -

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2003873003_arcticice07m.html

2.It's been reviewed and has links to other people who said it.

3. She was a enviromental and health news reporter.

4. All ice pieces that float on top of water will be melted by 2050.

5. Yes. Because since the caps are already melting it won't take that long to melt completely.

1. Center for Environmental Journalism - http://www.cejournal.net/?p=1376

2. Interviews from different scientists were made to get true accurate facts.

3. Its been reviewed by others and comments have been made.

4. There are predictions that the Arctic ocean will be free of ice in 20 years, sea levels will rise.

5. Yes because there have been many floods

F2: Does Global Warming cause melting of Glaciers ?

1. Ellen Mosley Thompson - http://www.ecobridge.org/content/g_evd.htm

2. She is a Scholar in the Department of Geography at Ohio State University and a research scientist at the Byrd Polar Research Center.

3. She is an examiner of Greenland and Antarctic glaciers.

4. It showed that in the past 100 years was when the himilayas has been the hottest showing that the climate is affecting it.

5. yes. pictures and facts.




1. WWF Climate Change Program - http://assets.panda.org/downloads/glacierspaper.pdf

2. They study and write about these problems.

3. They are a enviromental conservation program trying to stop global warming.

4. As the glaciers are melting it increases floods, fresh water shortages, and rise of water.

5. Yes.




1. Kevin Mathias - http://www.buzzle.com/articles/global-warming-and-melting-glaciers.html

2. He is a Technical Writer and wrote this column in 2007

3. He studies and tests out therories.

4. As the ice melts snow comes to cover it and since temperatures are rising melting the ice the snow isn't there in time to save it.

5. Yes. All the glaciers are dissapearing because of rising temps.

F1: Were all the continents ever connected as one?

1. Josh Hill - http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2009/02/were-antarctica.html . Info from this site was all from John Goodge, a NSF-funded researcher with the Department of Geological Sciences at the University of Minnesota-Duluth.


2. John Goodge was educated at University of California, Los Angeles for a Ph.D., University of Montana, Missoula for a M.S. and Carleton College, Northfield, Minnesota for a B.A. (Honors). He does research on geology interests and now is a professor of five courses at the University of Minnesota.


3. He goes out to different countries researching different geological questions he and others have. He runs tests on land and other things.


4. The shifting of the continents has caused us to believe that all continents were connected at once. It was called Pangaea and Rodinia at that time.

5. Yes. Because when you look at some continents they look like they fit together.




1. Alfred Wegener - http://waynesword.palomar.edu/cntdrift.htm .

2. Alfred Wegener was a climatologist and geophysicist that published a book in 1915 called The Origin of Continents and Oceans. He got his PH.D in astronomy at the University of Berlin.

3. He was the first scientist to come up with this theory.

4. There was there was a continental drift and plate tonics that " float " causing the continents to separate.

5. Yes. Because due to natural disasters and science theories it is possible for this to happen.




1. Deborah Tewhey - http://www.scarborough.k12.me.us/wis/tea...

2. She is a teacher at Wentworth Intermediate School in Maine.

3. She studied this theory.

4. We know that it is possible because the same fossils, and other land particles were found on other continents. It is believed that years ago animals would walk from continent to continent.

5. Yes.

I belive it because there ar so many sources of evidence that leads to a great explination to this question.